Same upbringing, same parents. Different careers, different interests, different experiences.
Friday, April 11, 2014
Poetry from 5,280 feet (Denver)
Two Poems that I want to share and get documented that I've had hanging in my office for as long as I can remember. Yes, all the offices I've had at all the employers I've had.
The reason, you ask?
Because they frame what's important, and more importantly, what's not. That clarity is important in life and on the job. And it's a reflection that in the hustle and bustle of knocking out my daily or weekly 'to do' list I seldom have time or inclination to think about.
I seem to remember that both poems were read at Grandpa Birchard's funeral. That they pointed to the way he lived his life. I don't know whether either of these statements are actually true or not, but it's a nice remembrance even if they aren't true. I want to remember Grandpa fondly so that's the "truth" I'm hanging on to.
Well, without further ado, here they are:
The Man in the Glass (anonymous)
When you get what you want in your struggle for self
and the world makes you king for a day,
Just go the mirror and look at yourself
and see what that man has to say.
For it isn't your father or mother or wife
whose judgment upon you must pass,
the fellow whose verdict counts most in your life
is the man staring back from the glass.
Some people might say your a straight-shootin' chum
and call you a wonderful guy,
but the man in the glass says you're only a bum
if you can't look him straight in the eye.
He's the fellow to please, never mind all the rest
for he's with you clear up to the end,
and you've passed your most dangerous, difficult test
if the man in the glass is your friend.
You may fool the whole world down the pathway of years
and get pats on the back as you pass,
but your final reward will be heartaches and tears
if you've cheated the man in the glass.
The Station (by Robert Hastings)
Tucked away in our subconscious is an idyllic vision. We see ourselves on a long trip that spans the continent. We are traveling by train. Out the windows we drink in the passing scene of cars on nearby highways, of children waving at a crossing, of cattle grazing on a distant hillside, of smoke pouring from a power plant, of row upon row of corn and wheat, of flatlands and valleys, of mountains and rolling hillsides, of city skylines and village halls.
But uppermost in our minds is the final destination. On a certain day at a certain hour we will pull into the Station. Bands will be playing and flags waving. Once we get there so many wonderful dreams will come true and the pieces of our lives will fit together like a completed jigsaw puzzle. How relentlessly we pace the aisles, damning the minutes for loitering - waiting, waiting, waiting for the Station.
"When we reach the Station, that will be it!" we cry. "When I'm eighteen." "When I buy a new 450 SL Mercedes Benz!" "When I put my last kid through college." "When I have paid off the mortgage!" "When I get a promotion!" "When I reach retirement, I shall live happily ever after!"
Sooner or later we must realize there is no Station, no one place to arrive at once and for all. The true joy of life is the trip. The Station is only a dream. It constantly outdistances us.
It isn't the burdens of today that drive men mad. It is the regrets over yesterday and the fear of tomorrow. Regret and fear are twin thieves who rob us of today.
So stop pacing the aisles and counting the miles. Instead, climb more mountains, eat more ice cream, go barefoot more often, swim more rivers, watch more sunsets, laugh more and cry less. Life must be lived as we go along. The Station will come soon enough.
______
These two poems are my very favorites of all time. Not that I'm a poem connoisseur. They resonate with me and are aspirational. Can flip my daily issues and how I react to them on end. I wouldn't say I live my life this way as much as I should, but it's good to continue to strive for what they suggest. And I believe strongly in what they promote.
Usually when I wander off in reflection and happen to see them pinned at my desk it's been a trying day. Today was no exception. But after reading them I turn off the computer, pack up my bag, and head home to what's important - and leave behind (for a while at least) all that is not.
Ed on Paying College Athletes
Wow, what a topic! I don't begin to understand the complex array of issues on this topic but that doesn't keep me from having an opinion! And, I would say you have to pay them. Some how some way. And yes, that will come at the detriment to a post secondary educational system that is lagging other countries. We are slipping farther and farther from the top. But to not face the fact that colleges and universities are making millions and millions of dollars on these athletes just isn't right. They have rights and a free education isn't a fair trade for what they create for the schools where they choose to display their talents. I don't know how to recast the system, but as it exists today is just doesn't work. Surely we have some smart people out there who can recreate a better system that rewards athletes and yet preserves (and hopefully elevates) the academic rigor that will enable the USA to continue to be the very best post-secondary education of choice in the world today.
Friday, April 4, 2014
College sports
An oft written about topic on the blog, I had a renewed anger for the topic after listening to NFLPA President DeMaurice Smith speak on the morning show of Mike & Mike on ESPN. It prompted me to write the following email to both he and the Mike & Mike show:
---------------------
Mike, Mike, Mr. Smith,
I just listened to the interview with Mr. Smith on the Mike and Mike morning show, thank you for bringing this topic to your show. I grew up in a union household, my father was a union welder for 42 years. I am now a business executive although not in an organization that has a union.
I must say how disappointed I was in Mr. Smith’s stance. The vitriol in his responses do nothing to encourage the dialogue that is so critical to address a very serious issue. Examples include characterizing the NCAA and its partner institutions as “un-American”, referring to Kain Colter and his teammates as “kids” when referring to being taken advantage of, but also as “brave young men” to stand up to the NCAA. Stating these are the same issues that have been needed since the founding of the NCAA in the early 1900s. Stating this has nothing to do with money.
This language is patronizing and extreme. This discourse is very American. Kain Colter is not a kid, he is a brave young man whom I am so excited has sparked this dialogue. The lack of prevalence and the lack of knowledge about sports injuries today is incomparable to 100 years ago. This is exclusively about money (and it should be), and how that money is spent to ensure the safety and fair treatment of everyone in the equation.
Mr. Smith has likely done a tremendous service by swaying public opinion with his grandstanding, but has contributed nothing to encourage the dialogue that is so desperately needed to address a very real and serious problem for thousands of student athletes, our academic institutions that produce millions of capable and intelligent citizens, and the NCAA.
The defense for this approach is most certainly that embarrassment and harassment is the only way to bring whomever is on the other side to the table. I disagree. It is a dysfunctional and disrespectful approach that unfortunately is endorsed by more and more of our nation’s institutions every day.
I am very excited that Mr. Colter has forced this issue to the forefront, change must happen in the current NCAA system. I am saddened that this cause will be pirated by individuals like Mr. Smith whom are only interested in using this issue to continue to advance their own extreme thoughts and agenda.
---------------------
Still incensed on the topic and wanting more, I forwarded my thoughts to a friend who played football in the NFL for a decade. He pointed me to this article. This is the first detailed account I have read to educate myself about the topic. I have limited my commentary in the past, most recently with Ed when asked, based on knowing that I'm not versed on a topic that my friend described as "such a nuanced/multi-faceted issue and gets oversimplified by grandstanders and trumpet blowers". Among the most important aspect of this very thorough and detailed article are the following set of questions:
---------------------
Would college players be content with the augmented scholarship or allowance now requested by the National College Players Association? If a player’s worth to the university is greater than the value of his scholarship (as it clearly is in some cases), should he be paid a salary? If so, would teammates in revenue sports want to be paid equally, or in salaries stratified according to talent or value on the field? What would the athletes want in Division III, where athletic budgets keep rising without scholarships or substantial sports revenue? Would athletes seek more or less variance in admissions standards? Should non-athletes also have a voice, especially where involuntary student fees support more and more of college sports? Might some schools choose to specialize, paying players only in elite leagues for football, or lacrosse? In athletic councils, how much would high-revenue athletes value a simple thank you from the tennis or field-hockey players for the newly specified subsidies to their facilities?
---------------------
This is an incredibly complex topic that few truly understand (I am not among them). But what I am sure of is that the student-athlete model and the NCAA is a deeply flawed institution that needs a complete overhaul. I can only hold out hope that the lawyers and grandstanders don't trade one subpar process for another enriching only themselves in the process. And I'm going to work to continue to educate myself on the topic as it will remain impactful on me for personal, social and professional reasons.
---------------------
Mike, Mike, Mr. Smith,
I just listened to the interview with Mr. Smith on the Mike and Mike morning show, thank you for bringing this topic to your show. I grew up in a union household, my father was a union welder for 42 years. I am now a business executive although not in an organization that has a union.
I must say how disappointed I was in Mr. Smith’s stance. The vitriol in his responses do nothing to encourage the dialogue that is so critical to address a very serious issue. Examples include characterizing the NCAA and its partner institutions as “un-American”, referring to Kain Colter and his teammates as “kids” when referring to being taken advantage of, but also as “brave young men” to stand up to the NCAA. Stating these are the same issues that have been needed since the founding of the NCAA in the early 1900s. Stating this has nothing to do with money.
This language is patronizing and extreme. This discourse is very American. Kain Colter is not a kid, he is a brave young man whom I am so excited has sparked this dialogue. The lack of prevalence and the lack of knowledge about sports injuries today is incomparable to 100 years ago. This is exclusively about money (and it should be), and how that money is spent to ensure the safety and fair treatment of everyone in the equation.
Mr. Smith has likely done a tremendous service by swaying public opinion with his grandstanding, but has contributed nothing to encourage the dialogue that is so desperately needed to address a very real and serious problem for thousands of student athletes, our academic institutions that produce millions of capable and intelligent citizens, and the NCAA.
The defense for this approach is most certainly that embarrassment and harassment is the only way to bring whomever is on the other side to the table. I disagree. It is a dysfunctional and disrespectful approach that unfortunately is endorsed by more and more of our nation’s institutions every day.
I am very excited that Mr. Colter has forced this issue to the forefront, change must happen in the current NCAA system. I am saddened that this cause will be pirated by individuals like Mr. Smith whom are only interested in using this issue to continue to advance their own extreme thoughts and agenda.
---------------------
Still incensed on the topic and wanting more, I forwarded my thoughts to a friend who played football in the NFL for a decade. He pointed me to this article. This is the first detailed account I have read to educate myself about the topic. I have limited my commentary in the past, most recently with Ed when asked, based on knowing that I'm not versed on a topic that my friend described as "such a nuanced/multi-faceted issue and gets oversimplified by grandstanders and trumpet blowers". Among the most important aspect of this very thorough and detailed article are the following set of questions:
---------------------
Would college players be content with the augmented scholarship or allowance now requested by the National College Players Association? If a player’s worth to the university is greater than the value of his scholarship (as it clearly is in some cases), should he be paid a salary? If so, would teammates in revenue sports want to be paid equally, or in salaries stratified according to talent or value on the field? What would the athletes want in Division III, where athletic budgets keep rising without scholarships or substantial sports revenue? Would athletes seek more or less variance in admissions standards? Should non-athletes also have a voice, especially where involuntary student fees support more and more of college sports? Might some schools choose to specialize, paying players only in elite leagues for football, or lacrosse? In athletic councils, how much would high-revenue athletes value a simple thank you from the tennis or field-hockey players for the newly specified subsidies to their facilities?
---------------------
This is an incredibly complex topic that few truly understand (I am not among them). But what I am sure of is that the student-athlete model and the NCAA is a deeply flawed institution that needs a complete overhaul. I can only hold out hope that the lawyers and grandstanders don't trade one subpar process for another enriching only themselves in the process. And I'm going to work to continue to educate myself on the topic as it will remain impactful on me for personal, social and professional reasons.
Thursday, April 3, 2014
Thin Air
Brad recently sent an article that was in one of the airline magazines about an author that reacts to 38,000 feet the way I do. Can you say CRAZY?
Yeah, this author totally stole my thunder.
I've been taking from ribbing from my brothers about the impact of elevation and planes has on my psyche. How, at 38,000 feet I get a different perspective that, well, changes my perspective. It also changes my pace. Even though I'm traveling at 500 miles an hour it seems like the world is moving slower. The landscape definitely moves slower from that elevation. It's just a cool experience, assuming you aren't running into turbulence.
So the article just pointed out how the change in perspective changed the author's perspective and provided him time from his "hustle and bustle" daily life to think about where he came from, where he is, and where he's going. I particularly liked the end where, much like I experience, the wheels touch down, everyone turns back on their smart phones, and the world goes right back to it's old and hectic pace. Time is up, stick a fork in the experience, it's OVER.
Crazy how flights do that to me but it sure was comforting to know that I'm not the only one that is impacted in this way.
So until I'm on a plane again (which actually is pretty soon) I'll just keep having 'ground zero' thoughts, pounding out my 'to do' list, and trying to keep up with what is my daily life. Little reflection allowed.
Yeah, this author totally stole my thunder.
I've been taking from ribbing from my brothers about the impact of elevation and planes has on my psyche. How, at 38,000 feet I get a different perspective that, well, changes my perspective. It also changes my pace. Even though I'm traveling at 500 miles an hour it seems like the world is moving slower. The landscape definitely moves slower from that elevation. It's just a cool experience, assuming you aren't running into turbulence.
So the article just pointed out how the change in perspective changed the author's perspective and provided him time from his "hustle and bustle" daily life to think about where he came from, where he is, and where he's going. I particularly liked the end where, much like I experience, the wheels touch down, everyone turns back on their smart phones, and the world goes right back to it's old and hectic pace. Time is up, stick a fork in the experience, it's OVER.
Crazy how flights do that to me but it sure was comforting to know that I'm not the only one that is impacted in this way.
So until I'm on a plane again (which actually is pretty soon) I'll just keep having 'ground zero' thoughts, pounding out my 'to do' list, and trying to keep up with what is my daily life. Little reflection allowed.
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
Ed on Happy
Brad,
LOVED this post, it helped me tremendously. So much so that I showed it to Holly and the kids as inspiration. Loved the videos and the songs too. Downloaded both to my iTunes account. While the source of happiness appears to be complex and hard to attain, it really is very simple - just like the songs. Enjoy and appreciate what you have, feel blessed, do what you love and be with the people who add to that feeling. Spread the feeling and your personality will become magnetic. Everyone wants some more happy!
It's easy for the tide to turn, for us to focus on problems and the things that aren't going well in our lives. To dwell on them and let that overtake anything good that is going on in our lives. The key is to be aware this is happening, and change course to get back on the happy track.
I'm happy, very happy. I have the best family anyone could ask for and they are the primary source of my happiness. My immediate family, my extended family, and even my close personal friends who I cherish my time with. I have a good job working for a good company and the money I make enables me to make investments in those things I care about most - my family and some activities I really enjoy.
I'm not doing my happy dance in my office as I type this, but I am thankful. Thankful for my good health, my incredible family, and the life I am living.
Thanks for sharing Brad. Reading the post brought me back to my happy place!
LOVED this post, it helped me tremendously. So much so that I showed it to Holly and the kids as inspiration. Loved the videos and the songs too. Downloaded both to my iTunes account. While the source of happiness appears to be complex and hard to attain, it really is very simple - just like the songs. Enjoy and appreciate what you have, feel blessed, do what you love and be with the people who add to that feeling. Spread the feeling and your personality will become magnetic. Everyone wants some more happy!
It's easy for the tide to turn, for us to focus on problems and the things that aren't going well in our lives. To dwell on them and let that overtake anything good that is going on in our lives. The key is to be aware this is happening, and change course to get back on the happy track.
I'm happy, very happy. I have the best family anyone could ask for and they are the primary source of my happiness. My immediate family, my extended family, and even my close personal friends who I cherish my time with. I have a good job working for a good company and the money I make enables me to make investments in those things I care about most - my family and some activities I really enjoy.
I'm not doing my happy dance in my office as I type this, but I am thankful. Thankful for my good health, my incredible family, and the life I am living.
Thanks for sharing Brad. Reading the post brought me back to my happy place!
Holy Bracketology Batman!
I completed my picks this morning. And then I went to ESPN.com to see how I did last night. I was 1-1, picked Albany but also picked Xavier, who lost. Oh well. I'm looking forward to this year's tournament bracket. As I told Brad on the phone this morning, 6-10 teams have a legitimate chance of winning it all - and one of them isn't IOWA. But I've gotta say it ... GO HAWKS!
Another thing I learned this morning from ESPN.com. My picks for the Elite 8 are exactly the same as the President of the United States! Our Final Four picks are also exactly the same. Well, at least we agree on something!!!
I'm looking forward to March Madness. Would be great if you both would post your brackets as well and we'll see how each of us fare. Brad, I know you completed one at your wife's prompting and Marc, I hope you're willing to join in the fun.
Another thing I learned this morning from ESPN.com. My picks for the Elite 8 are exactly the same as the President of the United States! Our Final Four picks are also exactly the same. Well, at least we agree on something!!!
I'm looking forward to March Madness. Would be great if you both would post your brackets as well and we'll see how each of us fare. Brad, I know you completed one at your wife's prompting and Marc, I hope you're willing to join in the fun.
Tuesday, March 11, 2014
Love/Happy
In February 2001 Dave Matthews Band released their album Everyday which included the song Everyday. It is a simple, happy song and the video that was made is fantastic. “All you need is love”, what a super message.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RXe8PFKsOIc
Well, there is a song now with an equally simple and fantastic message: Happy by Pharrell Williams. “Happiness is the truth, I’m happy”, another simple song with a simple message. And another great video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6Sxv-sUYtM
Watch both of these videos, go read the lyrics. Then give somebody a hug, and dance your happy dance.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



