Friday, January 6, 2012

Starbucks makes me think


I found a couple of interesting articles in a freebie newspaper, The Epoch Times, last night at Starbucks. First, let me throw out a disclaimer that this is a free newspaper because it was created and is funded by supporters of the Falun Gong (Falun Dafa) movement, which is a sort of hybrid Buddhist religion. I had a hunch it was because of the content of a few of the articles and the plethora of advertising for the Shen Yun Performing Arts. Jennifer and I went to one of their performances last year at the Kennedy Center in DC. Their performances are advertised as a look at the grace and wisdom of five thousand years of Chinese culture through colorful and exhilarating performances of classical Chinese dance and music (no mention of anything related to Falun Gong). What they don't tell you is that it is an indoctrination for the Falun Gong movement, complete with volunteers who make attempts to proselytize the audience following the performance. It's the equivalent of going to a "five thousand year journey through middle eastern culture" that really turns out to be the passion play with bible thumpers attempting to save your soul following the performance. I don't mind some religion mixed in with fine arts, as long as it's advertised up front. I probably still would have gone (the music and dancing were beautiful) but I left with a bad taste in my mouth, as if I had been bamboozled. I guess that could have been a blog post all on its own. On to the articles.

The first article that caught my eye is about the Volkswagen company in Germany. "In an effort to improve work-life balance, VW's Workers' Council took the initiative to push through this effort…" What is this effort? Every day after 6:30pm, company issued Blackberry phones will not be able to receive any company emails until 7:30am the following day. It's all part of an attempt to prevent burnout by their employees and make sure that they don't have to work at home late in the evening. I think it's a pretty cool idea. In the article they mention an author who criticizes what he calls the "misguided culture of overwork in the United States." You can read his article here… it's an interesting read. I've read some about companies that are on the "cutting edge" of management techniques that are allowing naps after lunch and other measures that ultimately lead to better performance and production. If you read the article from the Epoch Times and the one criticizing the American work ethic, there is a good case that the Germans have it right and that the "work work work" mentality isn't the most productive. I know that the Navy created a Task Force Work/Life (TFWL) in 2007 that was awarded in 2010 by the Alliance for Work Life Progress for its initiatives. How is work/life balance being addressed in the corporate world these days? By the way, the average full-time German works 1436 hours a year, and the average full-time American works 1804 hours. That's roughly an additional nine hours a week.

The second article that I noticed is actually a book review that touches on a blog that you wrote (Ed) a couple of weeks ago about busyness. The book is called "Simplicity Parenting" and is subtitled "Using the Extraordinary Power of Less to Raise Calmer, Happier, and More Secure Kids." Of course I haven't read the book, but reading some of its basic concepts in the review intrigued me. A quote from the book says, "We are building our daily lives, and our families, on the four pillars of too much: too much stuff, too many choices, too much information, and too much speed. With this level of busyness, distractions, time-pressure, and clutter (mental and physical) children are robbed of the time and ease they need to explore their worlds and their emerging selves."

The book is written by an M. ED. with years of experience as a school counselor and as a consultant and trainer for private schools so he's no slouch. The concept is interesting enough to me that I may add this to my "to read" list even though I don't have kids. The concepts sound like they would apply to adults as well. I checked out the book on Amazon and all of the reviews that it's received have been good, except for one (and that was someone who just complained that they were already familiar with the concepts in the book). I know that we live in a different age, but I do often wonder when kids have time these days to just be kids. Many, if not all, of the stories that we regurgitate over and over with each other an with our cousins were events that happened while we were doing "nothing". It was time that was nothing more than play time.

Maybe if Dad kept us busier when we were kids he would have had fewer nails in the tops of his sawhorses!

Getting High


I’m practicing my journalism skills by creating an eye catching and provocative headline that only loosely relates to the topic at hand. You like? I’ll bet it got Dad’s attention! Now on to Marc’s question…

I’ve always had a fascination with heights. My first recollections were that of buildings in cities. I’m still the guy that walks down a major city street looking up at the huge buildings. When I was in college I started becoming interested in hiking and rock climbing through a good friend Jamie Kurt. His head was firmly in the clouds, dreaming in college of and now actually living in Denver, the gateway to the most plentiful mountain region of the continental US. Through his friendship and my/our hiking adventures, my perspective began to change and I started to recognize nature and the beauty and tranquility of mountains.

I’ve matured significantly since my college days (in some ways) and that maturity has, among other things, calmed my mind enormously. The mind of most 20-somethings is wild and chaotic, and mine was on cognitive red bull. I’ve learned calm my gray matter a bit, and sustain the mental focus that allows me to appreciate experiences more. This includes allowing myself to be humbled by the beauty of nature. My experiences along this path have been “escalating”: initially through my college adventure experiences, more recently doing significant research and reading about expeditions in faraway places, and now planning some larger scale adventures myself. It is not unlike a quote on a different topic by Michael Hyatt: “You are not as smart as you think you are, but you have more potential than you can possibly imagine; and the secret from one to the other is humility, if you'll be humble and learn, you'll get there and make a big dent." My own maturity and humility at the prospect of nature’s marvels has allowed me to truly appreciate their grandeur. What a better place to realize one’s enormous and God-given physical potential than through the exploration of our world!

So, in a time when humanity is advancing on and destroying the precious few unspoiled natural landscapes of our world, the mountains to me seem one of the few final frontiers where a true connection to a natural and untamed landscape can be made. One of the few places where our mind and our body can connect with a “field of play” this is at once harsh, trying, but above all fair. There are rules, and although we may not always understand them, they don’t change. And don’t I owe it to myself and my Maker to find my outer limit?

This post is reading like an Ed on an airplane at 37,000 feet, but I will close with two quotes from a wonderful book by explorer Mark Jenkins:

• Real alpinists know how to turn off their head. From years of experience they realize that half the time the body knows better than the know-it-all-mind. The mind is too fickle. Optimistic one minute, pessimistic the next, pitching back and forth like a rowboat on big seas. Not the body. The body doesn’t exaggerate or self-deprecate or play mind games. The body is a machine, a realist. If it’s hard and painful, well then it’s hard and painful. If it’s a cruise, then it’s a cruise. The body doesn’t make mountains into anything. The body is an animal. It moves and lives, only in the present.

• Adventure is no longer simply about exploitation or education; it’s about the quest for understanding. You don’t need a mountain or a river or a jungle – you need only an open mind. Your goal does not have to be a first; it only need be something that takes you to a new place and challenges you physically, mentally, emotionally, or spiritually.

Let the heckling begin!

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Marc on Brad's 2012 List

Nice work Brad. Way to make us slackers feel like - well, slackers.

I think we've talked about it on the phone previously, but I don't remember what the source is of this desire you have to hike at altitude. It's interesting to me because I really have none - and I mean zero - inclination to do so. Granted, there are probably some great views above 14K feet, but that's not enough motivation for me to want to do it.

Are you going to introduce Sasha to your brand of back country single-man tent camping, or the Marc and Jennifer brand 8-man tent with a queen-size inflatable mattress camping?

Jennifer would LOVE for me to quit biting my nails, but I don't see it happening. I've told her (and it's the truth) that I only bite my nails when I'm completely bored, which usually happens in meetings at work. I don't think I can avoid that. I don't know why white fingernail tips look so appetizing!

I really hope it does work out, but Jennifer and i have said for quite a few years that when I retire from the military, we'd like to take six months to a year to travel around the United States and visit national parks. We would do it in some kind of RV (think more Will Smith's Motorhome vice the Christmas Vacation RV) and just freewheel it around the country. I hope it actually pans out.

I used to teach SMART goals back in the Navy Leadership Continuum. Those were the good ole days! I've probably mentioned this before, but the two concepts that I have carried forward from the curriculum and used the most are Blanchard's Situational Leadership II model and Victor Vroom's Expectancy Theory of Motivation. I like the concept of SMART goals, I'm just not very good at doing it! As a side note, I decided to do a search on Situational Leadership, and a training session from Blanchard's company on Situational Leadership runs about $2000, and that's if you're an American Management Association member! Holy smokes!

Brad on 2012 priorities & goals


You know how this fella get's jazzed about goals. I've included a SMART goal graphic for all. I also like to set general priorities that aren’t necessarily goals, but guiding ideals for what is important to me.

General priorities
1. Moderation in diet.
2. Moderation in spending money.
3. No clock punching at work.
4. Maximum time with Sheila, Sasha, Kira.

Goals
1. Read 12 books.
2. Hike above 14,000 feet twice.
3. High point in at least 5 states.
4. Attend 5 men’s and 5 women’s UI sporting events.
5. 2 separate 1-1 activities each with Mom and Dad.
6. Rock climb 4 times on natural rock.
7. Introduce Sasha to camping, sleep in tent 4 times.
8. Visit 10 different state parks in Iowa.
9. Stop chewing fingernails (Sheila monthly judge).
10. Do 1 bike race/ride, 1 triathlon, and 1 running event half marathon or longer.
11. Swim 50 times (avg. 1/week).

Looking forward to motivating each other throughout the year to stay on task!

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Steven Bloom is a Jackass

Finally got around to watching the MSNBC video with the Bloom interview and his "defense" of his piece. You can just tell by his attitude that he's an elitist jackass. Now that I heard him speak about it, I find his piece more offensive than it did originally. It's actually hard for me to believe that he's stayed in Iowa all those years.

Sadly, he has already benefited from the media attention he's received, and probably WILL get out of Iowa because he'll get all kinds of job offers from uber-liberal colleges around the country now.

Good riddance.

Ed on Iowa, and the article from Steven Bloom

Brad, I didn’t have this context and really appreciate you providing it. I’ve just invested an hour at work in reading the article and all I have so say is … WOW. There’s a lot to think about packed into that article. And really, I’m not sure what to think of it. My initial reaction is that I was more offended by it than Marc, but not to a great degree. And yes, there were parts of the article that were endearing to me also, made me proud to be from Iowa.

One thing that does come to mind is how easy it is to use facts to mold your perspective of history, and what “really happened” from your unique perspective. And how easy it is to let the argument distract us. Distract us from what is far more pressing and important, our future. So what does the next 25 years hold for Iowa? That’s what I would like to debate, not imposing factually based jabs on both sides of an issue about what has already happened, unless there is a usefulness in understanding how that past can help us understand what is going to happen in the future.

Iowa, the United States, and the whole world (farmers, politicians, pastors, immigrants, etc.) needs to leave the past behind and should be far more interested in the future. I know that “history repeats itself” and that much can be gained from knowing and understanding what happened in the past. But that sounds like a hardened realist history professor talking. I say we should invest less of our precious energy and time on the past – and put far more interest and focus on ensuring our future.

So what does the future look like for Iowa? Now that’s great blog material …

More on Iowa

I wish that I could watch the video of his defense of the piece, but I'm at work, so this will have to do for now.

After reading through his article, I can't say that I found much of it offensive. It seemed fairly straight forward and some parts of it were even endearing to me. It was a little irritating to me that he strayed off course with the sole intent of taking a pot shot at Christianity, but other than that, it wasn't much different than what you would read in a RAGBRAI piece.

The offensive part, at least to me, is the assumption that all of these things about the state disqualify Iowans from picking a president. That is what I call the "Democrat Arrogance" in action. I'll try not to go too far down the rabbit trail, but my complaint about democrats has always been what I see as their elitist attitude. They think that Iowa farmers, or anyone from a community that has less than 500,000 people, or doesn't have a PhD, or doesn't have an Indian neighbor, is too stupid to decide who is best to lead our country. I believe that Iowa can choose a president as well as anyone can. I would love to have a follow-on argument with anyone that claims otherwise: Tell me what state IS qualified to choose the president. If it wasn't Iowa, who would it be?

There were less than 125,000 votes cast in Iowa last night (combined total). If you want to blame anyone for the power of the Iowa caucus, blame the media. Ultimately, that's what Mr. San Francisco is crying about; he doesn't understand how a state like Iowa, which he doesn't think is qualified to choose anything but a hunting dog, can have so much influence on an election. Maybe he should write home and ask the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to declare the Iowa caucus as unconstitutional.